SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 514

A.K.MATHUR, P.VENKATARAMA REDDI
C. S. Krishnamurthy – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Judgment

A.K. Mathur, J.—Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against an order passed by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 608 of 1998 whereby learned ­Single Judge by his order dated June 10, 2004 has allowed the appeal of State and set aside the order of the XXI Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI at Bangalore City, whereby he acquitted the appellant accused under Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 on the ground of sanction being invalid in CC No. 131/1990 dated 20th March, 1998.

3. Brief facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are that the accused Sri C.S. Krishnamurthy, Technical Supervisor, Bangalore Telephones, Bangalore was charge-sheeted for the offence under Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) alleging that during the period from May 25, 1964 to June 27, 1986 he acquired assets disproportionate to his known source of income. On 27th June, 1986 he was in possession of movables and immovable assets worth R. 4,01,454.58 disproportionate to his known source of income and did n






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top