SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 550

S.H.KAPADIA, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.N.VARIAVA
Dabur (India) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur – Respondent


Judgment

All these Appeals can be disposed of by this common Judgment as the point involved is the same. The dispute is regarding classification of two items manufactured by the Appellants, namely, (1) Lal Tail; and (2) Janam Ghunti. The Tribunal has held that the product Lal Tail is classifiable under Chapter heading 33.04. As regards ‘Janam Ghunti’, the matter has been remitted back to the original authority for a fresh decision.

2. We have heard the parties. In our view, there is no infirmity in the Order of the Tribunal insofar as it remits the matter back to the original authority for a fresh decision on classification of the product ‘Janam Ghunti’. Chapter Note 1. (c) of Chapter 30 states that Chapter 30 does not apply to aqueous distillates or aqueous solutions of essential oils even though they are suitable for medicinal uses. Further, under Chapter Note 1.(d) of Chapter 30 preparations of Chapter 33 would not fall under Chapter 30 even if they have therapeutic or prophylactic properties. The Tribunal has, therefore, correctly held that if ‘Janam Ghunti’ is an aqueous distillates or aqueous solutions of essential oils it would fall under Chapter 33 even though it may have the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top