S.H.KAPADIA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Ram Chandra – Respondent
Judgment
Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.
2. The State of Rajasthan is in appeal against the judgment of learned Single Judge, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur holding that there was non-compliance with the mandatory requirements of Section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short the ‘Act’). The said conclusion was arrived at on the ground that though the accused respondent had been given the option of being searched in the presence of Shri Satyender Singh (PW-3), the Deputy Superintendent of Police, he was in essence a member of the raiding party and, therefore, the search in his presence cannot at all be said to be in consonance with Section 50 of the Act, though he was a Gazetted Officer.
3. Background facts in a nutshell are as under:
On 8.9.1995 Prem Shaker Meena (PW-2), SHO Police Station, Kotwali, Baran having received information about illicit trafficking in narcotic substances, rushed to the place pointed out by the informant and apprehended the accused respondent. Satyendra Singh, Dy. S.P. (PW-3) also reached there. Subsequently, being of the suspicion that accused respondent was in possession of contraband, the SHO informed him of his
Kalema Tumba v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Madan Lal and Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Smt. Krishna Kanwar @ Thakuraeen v. State of Rajasthan
Prabha Shankar Dubey v. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh
Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana
Raghbir Singh v. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.