SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 501

ASHOK BHAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Mediqup Systems Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Proxima Medical System G. M. B. H. – Respondent


Judgment

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.—Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the ­order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in appeal from an order passed under its original civil jurisdiction being APOT No. 786 of 2002. The Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appeal of the appellant as well as the application for stay.

3. The short facts which are relevant for the purpose of disposal of this appeal are as follows :

The appellant-Company is engaged in business of import of medical equipment and service thereof in general and ULTRA-SOUND SCANNERS, in particular. The respondent-Proxima Medical System, GMBH, issued legal notice to the appellant-Company under Section 434 of the Companies Act mentioning that the appellant-Company is liable to pay the respondent a sum of US $ 5000 and US $ 11000 aggregating to US $ 16000. The appellant replied to the said notice and denied the liability to pay the amounts to the respondent. The respondent-Company filed a winding up petition being C.P.No. 316 of 2001 against the appellant-Company, inter alia, praying that the Company be wound up by the order of the Court and Official Liquidator of the Court b



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top