SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 625

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
Indore Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Shrikrishna Oil Mills – Respondent


Judgment

C.K. Thakker, J.—Leave granted.

2. In all these appeals, common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in several writ petitions is questioned by the Indore Development Authority. By the impugned order, the High Court allowed the writ petitions filed by the petitioners - contesting respondents herein - and quashed and set aside the notification dated April 5, 1983 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, notification dated January 23, 1984 issued under Section 6 of the said Act as also an order dated August 10, 1998 passed by the Director, Town and Country Planning, Bhopal.

3. To appreciate the controversy raised in the present batch of appeals, relevant facts may be stated.

4. The petitioners challenged before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Town Development Scheme No. 78 prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as “the Trust Act”) in accordance with the Master Plan of Indore. The case of the petitioners before the High Court was that a resolution was passed on November 9, 1976 being Resolution No. 196 for framing Scheme No. 78 by the Improvement Trust. A
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top