SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 736

S.N.VARIAVA, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.H.KAPADIA
SACI Allied Products LTD. , U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Meerut – Respondent


Judgment

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.—This appeal is preferred against the Final Order of the Customs Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi dated 22.6.1999 in Final Order No. 879/99-A in Appeal No. E/1225/95-A holding that the appellants are liable to pay excise duty on the basis of the sale price of the buyer to its dealers in Uttar Pradesh and not based on the appellants’ sale price to independent dealers.

2. The appellant is a company manufacturing detergent powder and allied products in its factory near Ghaziabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The appellant sells its goods from the factory to dealers spread throughout the country other than Uttar Pradesh at a particular price. It has paid excise duty for these sales on this price. No dispute has been raised by the Excise Department in respect of these sales.

3. The appellants also sold the goods in the State of Uttar Pradesh to a company called Syndet & Chemical Industries Ltd. (for short ‘Syndet’) at a price which was lower. Syndet, in turn, sold the goods to its dealers in Uttar Pradesh at a price which was higher than the price at which the appellants sold the product outside Uttar Pradesh. Roughly 35 of the goods ar














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top