SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 573

C.K.THAKKER, RUMA PAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Associated Cement Companies LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Judgment

Arijit Pasayat, J.—Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur upsetting judgment of a learned Single Judge who held that the Municipal Council, Kymore, presently known as Kymore Nagar Panchayat (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Municipal Council’) is bound by the Government Order dated 15.12.1995 issued by the State Government under the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’). Learned Single Judge was of the view that the power vests with the State Government who issued the said Government Order and there is no justification on the part of the Municipal Council in making the impugned demands on the basis of rates fixed by it. It was consequentially declared that the present appellant was not liable to pay the differential sum and was only required to pay tax at the rate of 0.20% as fixed by the State Government.

2. The factual position which is almost undisputed is essentially as follows:

The appellant, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (in short the ‘Companies Act’) has its head office at Bombay and is engaged in manufacture of various kinds of cement. It







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top