SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 792

B.P.SINGH, ARUN KUMAR
Nasir Sikander Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

B.P. Singh, J.—In this appeal by special leave the appellant has challenged his conviction under Section 307 IPC. The trial court sentenced him to undergo 4 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default to undergo two months rigorous im­prisonment. The High Court by its impugned judgment and order of 11th November, 1988 in Criminal Appeal No. 311 of 1991 upheld the convic­tion but reduced the sentence to 2 years rigorous imprisonment. It maintained the sentence of fine.

2. With the assistance of counsel appearing for the parties, we have gone through the evidence on record.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 20th May, 1990 at about 4.00 P.M. an altercation took place between PWs 2 and 3 on the one hand, and the appellant on the other. That altercation was followed by PW2 slapping the appellant. This occurrence took place at 4.00 p.m. Later at 9.00 P.M. when PWs 2 and 3 closed their shop and left for their house on a scooter driven by PW2, the appellant along with one Ravin­dra Swamy accosted them on the way. Ravindra Swamy hit the scooter with an iron rod as a result of which PW2 and PW3 fell down, whereaf­ter the appellant is said to have s








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top