SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 678

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
Secretary, O. N. G. C. , LTD. – Appellant
Versus
V. U. Warrier – Respondent


Judgment

C.K. Thakker, J.—Leave granted.

2. The present appeals are directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated February 15, 2003 in Writ Petition No. 3947 of 1994 and also against an order dated January 14, 2004 passed in Civil Application No. 63 of 2003.

3. To understand the controversy raised in the appeals, relevant facts in brief may be stated.

The respondent herein - petitioner before the High Court - was in service of Oil and Natural Gas Commission, (“Commission” for short) appellant herein. He was holding the post of Additional Director (Finance & Accounts) prior to his retirement. As an employee of the Commission, he was allotted quarter on December 10, 1982. He retired from service on reaching the age of superannuation with effect from February 28, 1990. It is the case of the appellant that after the retirement, an employee has to vacate the residential accommodation given to him by the Commission. The respondent, therefore, was in­formed by the Commission that he had to vacate the quarter. It was the policy of the Commission to grant four months’ time to retain a quar­ter by an employee after his retirement. Accordingly, the























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top