RUMA PAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K.THAKKER
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
Ducksole (I) LTD. – Respondent
Order
In C.A. Nos. 4167-4169/2000 : The dispute relates to the question whether the article manufactured by the respondent-assessee is classifiable under Tariff Heading 59.06 which is the contention of the appellant or Tariff Heading 52.06 which is the contention of the respondent-assessee. The two competing entries read as follows :
“52.06 Cotton fabrics (excluding fabrics covered under Heading Nos. 52.09, 52.10 and 52.11,-
(a) woven on looms other handlooms, and
(b) subjected to the process of bleaching, mercerising, dyeing, printing, water proofing, shrink-proofing, organdie processing or any other process or any two or more of these processes with the aid of power or steam.”
“59.06 Textile fabrics, otherwise impregnated coated or covered (including fabrics covered partially or fully with textile flocks or with preparations containing textile flocks) - Fabrics covered partially or fully with textile flocks or with preparation containing textile flocks;”
Chapter Note-5 which was earlier numbered as 4 in Chapter 59 reads as follows :
“(5) Heading No. 59.06 does not apply to–
(a) Fabrics in which he impregnation, coating or covering cannot be seen with the naked eye (usually Chapte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.