SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 299

B.N.SRIKRISHNA, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
Balwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Asstt. Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise – Respondent


Order

These two appellants, along with two others, were found guilty by the District Judge, Ludhiana for the offences punishable under Sections 18, 22, 23, 25, 28, 29 and 30 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Two of them i.e. Tarlochan Singh, S/o Chet Singh and Devinder Singh were acquitted by the High Court and the present appellants i.e. Balwinder Singh and Tarlochan Singh, S/o Darshan Singh were found guilty. It is against this that the appellants have come up before this Court by way of these appeals, i.e. Criminal Appeal No. 547 of 2004 was preferred by Balwinder Singh and Criminal Appeal No. 548 of 2004 was preferred by Tarlochan Singh.

Criminal Appeal No. 547 of 2004 :

2. The facts of this case are that on 6.1.1988 two trucks bearing Registration No. PJA 8677 and DIL 3372 were intercepted by the Central Excise and Customs Department, Ludhiana Division. The officers of the Customs Department conducted search of the vehicle in the presence of witnesses and it was found that the truck bearing registration No. PJA 8677 was having a secret compartment and found that 175 Kgs. of hero­ine and 39 Kgs. of Opium of foreign origin were concealed in this chamber





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top