S.H.KAPADIA, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.N.VARIAVA
Camlin LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai – Respondent
Order
In all these Appeals the questions which arise for consideration are : (1) whether the intermediate product manufactured by Camlin Limited is marketable and (2) if it is marketable then whether the product is to be classified under Chapter Heading 32.04 or 96.09.
2. As regards marketability, the Department has led evidence to show that one of the competitors of the Appellants i.e. Luxor Pen Co. was purchasing and importing into India a product, which according to the Department, is an identical product to the intermediate product manufactured by Camlin Limited. If the product which was so purchased and imported by Luxor Pen Co. is an identical product then the Department would have succeeded in showing marketability of this product. Therefore, the main thrust of the argument, on behalf of Camlin Ltd., has been that the product imported by Luxor is not the same product but a completely different product.
3. At this stage it, therefore, becomes necessary to see what is the product of Camlin Ltd. and what was the product imported by Luxor. It is an admitted position that the intermediate product is manufactured by Camlin Ltd. by thoroughly mixing in a jacket of vessel plastic po
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.