SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 653

2005(4) Supreme 670
Supreme Court of India
Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia, JJ.
Seema —Petitioner
versus
Ashwani Kumar —Respondent
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 291 of 2005
Decided on 15-4-2005
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner : Balraj Dewan, Advocate.

Headnote:Constitution of India—Article 136 —Matrimonial proceedings—Transfer petition—Absence of records relating to dates of marriages and parties to the marriage—Until a suitable legis­lation was made, Government orders/Executive instructions could be issued in terms of orders of Supreme Court and be be implemented where there was no statutory prescription for recording/registering the marriage. (Paras 3 and 4)

Order

Issue notice.

Issue notice on the application for ex-parte stay also.

2. There shall be interim stay of proceedings in Matrimonial Suit No. 104 of 2004 entitled Ashwani Kumar Vs. Seema, pending before Learned Addl. District Judge, Delhi.

3. During the hearing of this petition, it appeared to us that in the absence of records relating to dates of marriages and parties to the marriage, problems come up which have far-reaching conse­quences. We, therefore, request learned Solicitor General to consider whether Government orders by way of executive instructions can be issued, on the basis of directions of this Court, to various States and Union Territories to authorise officials specifi­cally to keep record of marriages so that they can be placed as evidence in different proceedings if the necessity arises. Learned Solicitor General submitted that there may be necessity of a suitable legislation in this regard as the Government Orders/executive instruc­tions may not suffer. We are of the view that until a ­suitable legislation is made, the Government Orders/executive instructions can be made enforceable in terms of the orders of this Court. These may be implemented where there is no statutory prescription for recording/registering the marriage, and may be done as an additional measure when there is any such prescription.

4. We have also requested Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Advocate to assist us in this matter. If learned Solicitor General feels, if so advised, he may require the State Governments and the Union Territories to place their views in this regard before him and this Court so that appro­priate directions can be issued. A copy of our order be handed over to learned Solicitor ­General and Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. for necessary steps in this matter.

Order accordingly.

**************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top