SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 886

ASHOK BHAN, A.K.MATHUR
U. P. State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Chairman – Appellant
Versus
Omaditya Verma – Respondent


Order

A.K. Mathur, J.—I.A.Nos. 14 to 17 have been filed in C.A.Nos. 6716-6719 of 1999 with prayer that Order dated 5.4.2005 be recalled as applicants were not served & they may be heard in the matter. We have heard learned counsel for parties and we don’t find any merit.

2. Applicant No. 1- Umaditya Verma was respondent No. 1 in C.A.No. 6716 of 1999 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 18435 of 1998. Dasti notice was served on him on May 25, 1999 in S.L.P (C) No. 18435 of 1998 and affidavit of dasti service has been sworn in by Shri H.S. Gaba, the Asst. Regional Manager of the appellant-U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and filed in the Registry along with duplicate copy of the notice which bears his signature. Applicant No.2- Smt. Santosh was respondent No. 5 in C.A.No. 6716 of 1999 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 18435 of 1998. Notice in S.L.P. (C) No. 18435 of 1998 was duly served on her by registered post and acknowledgment due card which was signed by her on March 5, 1999 has been received back in the Registry. Appli­cant No. 3-Digvijay Singh was respondent No. 7 in C.A.No. 6716 of 1999 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 18435 of 1998. He has been served dasti in S.L.P. (C) No. 18435 of 1





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top