SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 968

ARIJIT PASAYAT, H.K.SEMA
Phool Pata – Appellant
Versus
Vishwanath Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench in a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short ‘CPC’). The plaintiffs-respondents herein had filed a suit for specific performance of contract dated 30.7.1977 as well as for can­cellation of sale deed dated 14.5.1980. According to the plaintiffs a sum of Rs. 2,500/- had been paid as advance money and the considera­tion for sale was fixed at Rs. 10,000/-. Thus the balance amount of Rs. 7,500/- was to be paid at the time of execution of sale-deed. The suit was contested by the present appellant-defendant No. 3. The present appellant along with ­defendant No. 1 (respondent No. 4) con­tended that the permission to sell the land had been obtained from the Settlement Officer (consolidation) during the year 1980. When the plaintiffs were requested to purchase the land, they did not agree to get the sale deed executed. Thereafter defendant No.1-Jogendra Singh executed the sale deed in favour of the present, appellant and re­spondent No. 5.

3. The trial court decreed the suit and directed for s












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top