SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 817

RUMA PAL, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Indian City Properties LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Commissioner Of Greater Bombay – Respondent


Judgment

Ruma Pal, J.—Leave granted.

2. The appellant is the owner of Plot No. 2M/748 situated at M.L. Dhanukar Marg, Mumbai. On the plot, there is a bungalow, an out-house, cooling towers, a pump room, servants, quarters and a watchman’s room. The first appellant has let out the bungalow and the outhouse to the appellant No.2 for use as a guest house. On 16th November, 1999 a notice was issued to the appellants under Section 299 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) to the effect that the Corporation would take possession of “certain land not occupied by a building” forming part of the premises within the regular line of public street as prescribed by the Commissioner, under Section 299 of the Act..... together with its enclosing wall, hedge, or fence, if any, and any platform, verandah, step or other structure, which may be found upon the said land”. Notice was also given that if necessary the authority issuing the notice namely, the Deputy Municipal Commissioner (Zone-I), Greater Bombay, would “proceed to clear the building”.

3 Section 299 in so far as it is relevant is extracted verbatim below :-

“299. Acquisition of open land or of l





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top