SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1090

G.P.MATHUR, P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
Rajeshwari – Appellant
Versus
Puran Indoria – Respondent


Judgment

P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.—Leave granted.

1. This appeal is by the defendant. The plaintiff-respondent sued for specific performance of an agreement to sell the suit property having an extent of 2000 sq. feet. The price fixed was Rs. 2,500/-. A sum of Rs. 1,000/- was paid as advance. The agreement was entered into on 23.2.1981. The agreement did not fix any date for performance. The plaintiff issued a notice to the defendant on 31.7.1989, more than seven years after the agreement, calling upon the defendant to execute the sale deed on receipt of the balance consideration. The defendant not having responded, the plaintiff filed the suit on 01.11.1990 for specific performance.

2. The defendant having denied the claim for specific performance made by the plaintiff and having raised several defences the trial court raised the following issues for trial:

(1) Whether the plaintiff had been ready and willing to perform his part of the contract in pursuance of the agreement dated 23rd February, 1981 with respect to the part of the land measuring to 50 x 40 ft. described in paragraph No. 2 of the plaint?

(2) Whether the plaintiff cancelled the aforesaid agreement to sell the land after re





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top