SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1319

B.N.AGARWAL, A.K.MATHUR
Chander Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Joshi – Respondent


Judgment

A.K. Mathur, J.—These Contempt Petitions have been filed by the petitioners under Sections 2 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 129 of the Constitution of India.

2. The grievance of the petitioners was that the respondents have willfully disobeyed the judgment and orders passed by this Court on 20.3.2001 in Civil Appeal Nos. 8467-8468 of 1995. Therefore, contempt proceedings should be initiated against the respondents.

3. In order to decide these contempt petitions it would be necessary to recapitulate some facts. Civil Appeal Nos. 8467-8468 of 1995 along with Civil Appeal No. 2167 of 2001 @ SLP (C) No. 15849 of 1993, Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1994, Civil Appeal No. 6075 of 1997 were disposed of by this Court by a common order dated 20.3.2001. By that order this Court affirmed the order passed by the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court that Kurk Amins appointed on commission basis for recovery of outstanding dues of the co-operative societies hold civil post and are government servants.

4. The grievance of the petitioners was that despite the order passed by this Court the petitioners are not treated as Government servants nor are they being treated at








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top