R. C. LAHOTI, G. P. MATHUR, P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
State Of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Govind – Respondent
Judgment
G.P. Mathur, J.—1. Delay in filing the special leave petition is condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. This appeal has been preferred by the State of M.P. against the judgment and order dated 13.5.2003 of Justice N.S. Azad of M.P. High in Crl. Appeal No. 202 of 1996.
4. The trial Court convicted the accused under Section 376 I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo 7 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 200/- and in default to undergo R.I. for a further period of one month. The High Court partly allowed the appeal and while upholding the conviction of the accused reduced the sentence to the period already undergone which is nearly 7 months.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the sentence imposed by the High Court is wholly inadequate looking to the nature of the offence and is contrary to the minimum prescribed by law.
6. Sub-section (1) of Section 376 I.P.C. provides that whoever, except in the cases provided for by sub-section (2), commits rape shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than 7 years but which may be for life or for a term which may extend to 10 years and shall also be liable to fine. In the category of cases c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.