SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1296

RUMA PAL, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Rajender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lt. Governor, Andaman & Nicobar Islands – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.—Leave granted.

2. These two appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 22.12.2003 passed in W.P.C.T. No. 214 of 2003 by the High Court of Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair by which the High Court allowed the writ petition by dismissing the petition of the appellant herein before the Central Administrative Tribunal in which the appellant herein succeeded and judgment and order dated 20.2.2004 passed by the High Court of Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair in Review Petition bearing RVW No. 003 of 2004 by which the High Court dismissed the review petition filed by the appellant.

3. The short facts, which are relevant for the disposal of these two appeals, are as follows:

The appellant has been working continuously since 23.09.1976 as a Lecturer. He filed an application for regularisation of his service. The Tribunal disposed of the application with a direction to grant study leave within a period of three years vide order dated 17.6.1987. The operative part of the order reads as follows:

“Hence, it is ordered that the applicant be given an opportunity to acquire M. Phil degree from a recognised university within a period of three





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top