G. P. MATHUR, P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, R. C. LAHOTI
Mohd. Siddiq Ali – Appellant
Versus
High Court of A. P. through Registrar – Respondent
Judgment
G.P. Mathur, J.—1. The issue raised in the Civil Appeals and Writ Petitions which have been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution is same and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order.
2. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a notification on 23.10.1996 for making appointments to the posts of District Munsiff and the relevant part of the notification which has a bearing on the controversy in dispute is reproduced below:
“Notification
For appointment to the post of District Munsiffs.
Applications are invited for 200 posts of District Munsiffs of which 27 by limited Recruitment-backlog vacancies and 173 by General Recruitment in the A.P. State Judicial Services.
Vacancy Position:
....................................................... .......................................................
Note: 1. The General Recruitment vacancies are subject to the rule of Spl. Representation under Rule 10 of the Spl. Rules for A.P. State Judicial Service and also Rule 22(A)(2) of the A.P. State and Subordinate Service Rules.
2. The High Court reserves the right to increase or decrease the number of vacancies after issue of this notification, if necessary.”
After a written exa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.