B.P.SINGH, TARUN CHATTERJEE, P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
Naresh Kumar Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Union of Indias – Respondent
Judgment
B.P. Singh, J.—Special leave granted.
2. In this appeal the appellant impugns the order of detention passed against him by the State of Bihar on September 4, 2002 in exercise of powers conferred by Section 3(i), (ii) and (iii) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The High Court by its impugned judgment and order dated September 17, 2003 dismissed the writ petition and held that this was not an appropriate case in which the High Court could exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash an order of detention even before its execution. The correctness of the aforesaid view of the High Court is challenged before us.
3. The facts of the case are few and not disputed.
4. The appellant claims to be one of the partners of M/s. Prakash Transport, a partnership firm having its principal place of business at Kolkatta with branch offices all over India including on at Raxaul in the State of Bihar. The firm is engaged in the business of transportation of goods by road by hiring public carrier trucks. According to the appellant, on August 28, 2001 a Nepalese firm
Additional Secretary to the Government of India & Ors. v. Smt. Alka Subhash Gadia & Anr.
Union of India & Ors. v. Muneesh Suneja
P.U. Iqbal v. Union of India & Ors.
Ashok Kumar v. Delhi Administration
Bhawarlal Ganeshmalji v. State of Tamilnadu
Union of India & Ors. v. Parasmal Rampuria
Sayed Taher Bawamiya v. Joint Secretary to the Government of India & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.