SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1166

B.N.AGARWAL, ASHOK BHAN, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, Y.K.SABHARWAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Rameshwar Prasad (IV) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Order

1. Mr. P.S. Narasimha, learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition (C) No. 353 of 2005, made his submissions from 10.30 a.m. to 10.40 a.m. Mr. Soli J. Sorabjee, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners in Writ Petition (C) No. 257 of 2005, made his submissions for five minutes. Thereafter, Mr. Viplav Sharma, petitioner in person in Writ Petition (C) No. 258 of 2005, thereafter resumed his submissions and concluded at 12.20 p.m. Thereafter, Mr. Milon K. Banerji, learned Attorney General, made his submissions till 1.00 p.m. Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned Additional Solicitor General, appearing for the Union of India, thereafter made his submissions till 3.00 p.m.

2. Hearing concluded. Orders reserved.

3. In terms of the signed order, the Court, while giving brief reasons, accepted the submissions of the learned Attorney General and the learned Additional Solicitor General that this Court may not issue notice to the Governor, and stated that it will give detailed reasons later.

4. The hearing of the writ petitions is preponed; instead of 27.9.2005, the arguments in these matters would commence on 20.9.2005. Before 20.9.2005, the parties shall also file their written submis






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top