Order

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The appellants had been working as Telecom Technical Assistants. The next promotion of these appellants was to the post of Junior Telecom Officer (JTO). The promotion to the post of JTO was regulated by a screening test. 35% of JTOs were entitled to be promoted on the basis of a screening test to be conducted by the Department. The appellants herein and others participated in the screening test held on 30.4.2000. The qualifying percentage of marks in the screening test for getting promotion to the post of JTO was 40% for general candidates and 33% for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The appellants before us were not successful in qualifying the screening test. They approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench contending that the screening test was not done properly and several objective-type questions were asked in the screening test which were confusing and they were not in accordance with the model question paper distributed earlier to them. The Tribunal considered the matter and gave a direction on 11.4.2002 directing the present appellants to submit a representation to the Departm