SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1584

S.B.SINHA, P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
Prasad Technology Parki Pvt. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Registrar – Respondent


Judgment

S.B. Sinha, J.—Leave granted.

2. Whether execution of a supplementary agreement entered into by and between the Appellant and the Third Respondent herein would amount to a transfer so as to attract stamp duty payable in terms of Article 5(d) of the Schedule appended to the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, consequent upon the change of the name of the erstwhile company to the Appellant Company is the question involved in this appeal.

3. The basic fact of the matter is not in dispute. One “Prasad Garments Pvt. Ltd.” was a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. On or about 05.03.1999, it entered into a lease-cum-sale agreement with the Third Respondent herein upon payment of premium of a sum of Rs. 14,49,453, which amounted to 99% of the tentative cost of the land and one yearly rent of 966/- for a period of eleven years computed from 25.06.1997. The name of the said company, however, was changed to “Prasad Technology Park Pvt. Ltd.”.

4. The Appellant presented the said instrument for registration before the First Respondent herein on a stamp paper of Rs. 100/-. The First Respondent, however, was of the opinion that the stamp duty on the total amount of the original lease de

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top