SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 469

N.S.HEGDE, S.B.SINHA, A.K.MATHUR
U. Palaniappan – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Inspector of Police – Respondent


Order

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. On the facts and circumstances of this case, the condition imposed by the High Court while granting anticipatory bail that the first appellant should deposit Rs. 10 lakhs and the second appellant should deposit Rs. 5 lakhs before getting the benefit of anticipatory bail in our opinion is onerous. Hence, in modification of the said order while affirming the grant of anticipatory bail, we direct the appellants to furnish a self-bond of Rs. 50,000 each and one surety for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the Court or the arresting authority as the case may be.

Appeal disposed of accordingly.

***************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top