S.B.SINHA, P.P.NAOLEKAR
Tashi Delek Gaming Solutions LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.—Leave granted.
Introduction :
2. Scope and ambit of Article 131 of the Constitution of India is in question in these appeals, which arise out of a common judgment and order dated 16.03.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition Nos. 5516-5117 of 2004 and Writ Appeal Nos. 29-31 of 2005, whereby and whereunder the appeals preferred by the Appellants herein were dismissed.
Background facts :
3. It is not in dispute that the States of Sikkim and Meghalaya commenced online lotteries, inter alia, in the State of Karnataka. It is, however, otherwise a lottery playing State. In exercise of its power conferred upon it under Section 5 of the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 (for short, the Act’) a declaration was made that the State of Karnataka shall be free zone from online and internet lotteries. By reason of the said notification sale of all computerized and online lottery tickets marketed and operated through vending machines, terminals, electronic machines and through internet in the State of Karnataka became prohibited with immediate effect.
Writ Proceedings :
4. The States of Sikkim and Meghalaya together with its agents filed writ
Calcutta Gas Company (Proprietary) Ltd. State of West Bengal and Others
M/s B.R. Enterprises etc. v. State of U.P. & Ors. Etc.
State of Bihar v. Union of India
State of Rajasthan & Ors. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors.
Union of India v. State of Rajasthan
Ghulam Qadir v. Special Tribunal & Ors.
Dwarka Prasad Agarwal (D) By LRs. v. B.D. Agarwal and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.