SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 332

K.N.SINGH, M.P.THAKKAR
Director General, Telecommunication – Appellant
Versus
T. N. Peethambaram – Respondent


Advocates:
G.RAMASVAMY, HARISH N.SLAVE, N.D.GARG, N.SAFAYA, P.P.Rao, R.P.Srivastava, RAJIV K.GARG

Judgement

THAKKAR, J.:- Fails in one subject, but passes the examination! It is not a tounge-in-the-check remark, for, passing an examination does not mean passing or securing the minimum passing marks in each subject or item of examination provided the candidate secures the minimum passing marks in aggregate, and he is entitled to be declared as having passed the examination according to the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal hereafter), Hyderabad, which has upheld the aforesaid proposition canvassed by the respondent. The validity of this view is in focus before this Court in the present appeal by Special Leave..

2. Rule 2 in Appendix III of the Telegraph Engineering Service (Group B) Recruitment Rules, 1981, for limited Departmental qualifying Examination, in the context of which the controversy has arisen, reads thus : -

"2. Limited Departmental Competitive Examination :

(i)(a) Advanced Technical Paper - General... 100 marks

(b) Advanced Technical Paper - Special... 100 marks

(c) General Knowledge and Current Affairs... 50 marks

(d) Assessment of Confidential Reports... 75 marks

(ii)(a) The minimum pass marks in the examination shall be 50% for general candidates and 45% for Sch



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top