SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 331

M.M.DUTT, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Krishna Kurup – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, Gujarat Refinery, Baroda – Respondent


Advocates:
G.B.PAI, Indu Malhotra, M.K.RAMAMURTHY, M.N.SHROFF

Judgment

DUTT, J.: - This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated March 21, 1984 of the Gujarat High Court. The only question now involved in this appeal is whether 82 workmen should be directed to be absorbed by the respondent, Gujarat Refinery, Baroda. Initially the question related to 187 workmen including these 82 workmen whose services were alleged to have been terminated by the respondent by an oral order.

2. On October 18, 1984 when the special leave petition came up for hearing, Dr. L. M. Singhvi, learned counsel for the respondent, inter alia, stated before the Court that 105 employees in respect of whom the Gujarat High Court had recorded a finding for their absorption would be absorbed subject to scrutiny, and that such absorption would be prospective. Thereafter, it appears that this Court by its order dated November 15, 1984 directed the respondent, Gujarat Refinery and its General Manager, to complete the absorption of 105 workmen. On February 21, 1985, the learned counsel for the respondent informed this Court that all the 105 employees had been absorbed. In the circumstances, this Court granted special leave for the remaining 82 workmen excludin







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top