SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 501

B.C.RAY, M.P.THAKKAR
A. S. Sulochana – Appellant
Versus
C. Dharmaltngam – Respondent


Advocates:
K.RAM KUMAR

Judgment

M. P. THAKKAR, J. : - The view taken by the High Court that a tenant sought to be evicted on the ground of unlawful subletting under S. 10(2)(ii)(a)*1 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, must himself have been guilty of the contravention and that the alleged contravention by his father when he was a tenant can be of no avail for evicting him is assailed in this appeal by special leave. The High Court has so pronounced in the backdrop of the admitted fact that respondent had himself not created any sub-tenancy after he became the tenant in 1968 upon the death of his father. The plea raised by the appellant that the tenancy created in 1952 by the father of respondent rendered him liable to be evicted in the suit instituted by the appellant in 1970 was repelled. The unsuccessful landlord has now invoked this Courts jurisdiction under Art. 136 of the Constitution of India.

*1. "10(2) A landlord who seeks to evict his tenant shall apply to the Controller for a direction in that behalf. If the Controller, after giving the tenant a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the application, is satisfied

(i)xxxxxxxxx

(ii) that the tenant has after the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top