SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 437

G.L.OZA, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Elizabeth Dinshaw – Appellant
Versus
Arvand M. Dinshaw – Respondent


Advocates:
C.V.SUBBA RAO, K.HINGORANI

Judgement Key Points

What is the appropriate custody arrangement for a child when a parent abducts the child from one country to another, considering the best interests of the child? What is the proper court’s approach to resolving cross-border child custody in light of orders from foreign courts and established international principles? What rights and remedies does a foreign-court-ordered custodian have when the other parent unlawfully removes the child to another country and seeks to return the child?

Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)

What is the appropriate custody arrangement for a child when a parent abducts the child from one country to another, considering the best interests of the child?

What is the proper court’s approach to resolving cross-border child custody in light of orders from foreign courts and established international principles?

What rights and remedies does a foreign-court-ordered custodian have when the other parent unlawfully removes the child to another country and seeks to return the child?


Judgement

BALAKRISHNA ERADI, J.:- Immediately on conclusion of the hearing of arguments in the above Writ Petition on June 11, 1986, having regard to the urgency of the matter, we passed the following order :-

"We allow the Writ Petition and direct that the minor boy, Dustan be restored forthwith to the custody of the petitioner i.e. the mother with liberty to the petitioner to take him to the United States. The child will be a ward of the concerned Court in Michigan and it will be open to the father, first respondent herein to move that Court for a review of the custody of the child, if he is so advised. Detailed reasons will follow. The passport of the child which is in deposit with the Registrar of this Court will be returned to the petitioner i.e. the mother of the child today itself. The concerned authorities of the Govt. of India will afford all facilities to the mother to take the child back to the United States pursuant to the order passed by this Court."

We now proced to state in this judgment our reasons in support of the order.

2. The petitioner, Mrs. Elizabeth Dinshaw is a citizen of the United States of America residing in the State of Michigan. She is employed as a casewo

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top