SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 527

Vasant – Appellant
Versus
Dattu – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, S.L.BANADIKAR, V.N.GANPULE, VINA DEVI KHANNA

Judgment

CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :- Ganoba had four sons, Raoji, Ramchandra, Narsoba and Shanker. Raoji, Narsoba and Shanker died in that order. Shanker died in 1951. Vasant and Yaswant, defendant Nos. 4 & 5 are Raojis sons. Ramchandra is the first defendant and his sons are Manik and Moti, defendant Nos. 2 and 3. Narsoba died leaving behind him two widows Subabai and Kadubai. Shanker died leaving behind him a widow Aaubai.

2. We may mention here that at the time of death of Raoji, Narsoba and Shanker, the Hindu Womens Right to Property Act, 1937 was not applicable to the parties, as they were residents of the erstwhile native State of Hyderabad. In 1961 Kadubai the widow of Narsoba adopted Dattu. Aaubai, the widow of Shanker adopted Vilas. Soon after the adoptions, Dattu and Vilas filed the suit, out of which the present appeal arises for partition and separate possession of their shares in the joint family properties. Defendants 4 and 5 were the main contestants of this suit. Among several pleas raised by them, they also claimed that in 1956 there was a partition between Ramchandra on the one hand and defendants 4 and 5 on the other. However, the question of partition was not put in is











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top