SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 267

M.P.THAKKAR, S.NATARAJAN
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Bahuleyan – Respondent


Advocates:
E.M.S.ANAM, N.SUDHAKARAN

Judgment

S. NATARAJAN, J.:- While allowing this Appeal by Special Leave by the State of Kerala and restoring the conviction awarded to the respondent by the Sessions Judge under S. 302 of the Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life, we have, in our Judgment dated July 31, 1986, stated that the reasons will follow and accordingly we are giving the reasons for allowing the appeal against acquittal by the State.

2. The respondent-accused was charged under S. 302 of the Penal Code for having committed the murder of his wife Sulochana on the night of August 24, 1975, when she was sleeping in the house, by cutting her neck with a knife (M.O. 1). The occurrence was witnessed by the 13 year old daughter of the accused (P. W. 1) and a servant maid by name Omana (P. W. 2). The murder was committed because Sulochana was proving to be a stumbling block to the accused marrying P. W. 2 as his second wife and would not give her consent. The prosecution had examined P. Ws. 1 and 2 who had actually seen the commission of the murder and some of the neighbours viz. Karthyayani (P. W. 3), Mathew (P. W. 4) and Pavithran (P. W. 9) who had come out of their houses on hearing the co












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top