SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 44

M.P.THAKKAR, K.N.SINGH
M. G. Wagh – Appellant
Versus
Jay Engineering Works LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

THAKKAR, J.:- Whether S. 12(2)* of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1947 (Act) designed to prevent wholesale or partial evasion of repatriation of earnings from export of goods covers only sale proceeds of goods exported "for sale" as held by the High Court of Calcutta by the judgment under appeal, or to sale proceeds of goods exported "on sale" in the context of sales completed before export also, as held by the Madras High Court R. Venkatasubbu v. Director of Enforcement, Enforcement Directorate, New Delhi, ILR. 1968) 3 Mad 18 and as contended by the appellants is the problem.

*"12(2) Where any export of goods has been made to which a notification under sub-sec. (1) applies, no person entitled to sell. or procure the sale of the said goods shall, except with the permission of the Reserve Bank, do or refrain from doing anything or take or refrain from taking any action which has the effect of securing that -

(a) the sale of the goods is delayed to an extent which is unreasonable having regard to the ordinary course of trade, or

(b) payment for the goods is made otherwise than in the prescribed manner or does not represent the full amount payable by the foreign buyer in resp















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top