SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 41

B.C.RAY, M.P.THAKKAR
Ram Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

THAKKAR, J.:- Can a sanction to prosecute surrogate for a sanction to take cognizance?

2. Two safeguards are provided in regard to prosecution of members of the Armed Forces or of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order sought to be prosecuted for use of excessive force in the discharge or purported discharge of their duty :

(1) They cannot be "prosecuted" without obtaining a sanction to prosecute from the appropriate Government (Section 132*1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) (Cr. P.C.)

* 1. "132. Protection against prosecution for acts done under preceding sections - (1) No prosecution against any person for any act purporting to be done under Section 129, Section 139 or Section 131 shall be instituted in any Criminal Court except--(a) with the sanction of the Central Government where such person is an officer or member of the armed forces;(b) with the sanction of the State Government in any other case..........."

(2) No Court can take "cognizance" of an offence against such an official in the absence of the previous sanction of the appropriate Government (see Section 197*2 of Cr. P.C.)

* 2. "197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants --

(1)xxxx

(2) No Court












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top