SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 388

K.N.SINGH, M.P.THAKKAR
Chief Settlement Commissioner, Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Ram Singh – Respondent


Judgement

THAKKAR, J.:- Five displaced persons (respondents 1 to 5) were allotted certain lands under the provisions of Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 (Rules) from the compensation pool. By some inadvertent error on the part of the allotting authority in making computation, agricultural land to the extent of 11 standard acres, 2 units was allotted to them in excess of their lawful entitlement in lieu of agricultural lands left behind by them in areas now forming a part of Pakistan when they were obliged to migrate to India in the wake of the partition. A number of proceedings were undertaken in the context of the excess allotment made to them (hereafter called the allottees). Ultimately the Chief Settlement Commis-sioner by his order dated May 4, 1963 cancelled the allotment of the excess land (11 S. A. 2 units) which was made by an inadvertent mistake. On May 17, 1963 the allottees made an application praying that the excess land wrongly allotted to them should be sold to them under R. 73(2)(ii) of the Rules. On the premise that they had a legal right to purchase the excess land under the said rule. This application was rejected by the Chief Settlem








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top