Judgement

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. :- This petition arises out of the judgment and order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Sree P. P. Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of release was bad because the authorised officer had no power to review the previous order nor he had the power to release the property of the landlady without even giving an opportunity to the petitioner. In the facts of this case as noted by the High Court, we are unable to entertain these contentions. We are unable to accept the contention that the Government cannot review its own order. It is well-settled law of this Court that in case of bona fide need subsequent events must be taken into account if they are relevant on the question of release or possession of the premises in question. On a previous occasion the Government had declined to release the premises, later on the representation made by the landlady the Government changed its decision. The landlady had filed an application for releasing the premises in her favour, but the same was initially rejected on 25-9-1978. Again the landlady made a further representation stating certain additional and fresh circumstances, that is to