SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 626

A.P.SEN, B.C.RAY
Tara Devi – Appellant
Versus
Thakur Radha Krishna Maharaj, Through Sebaits Chandeshwar Prasad And Meshwar Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SARAN, L.N.Sinha

Judgement

B. C. RAY, J. :- This is a petition on special leave against the judgment and order dated January 11, 1987 of the High Court of Judicature of Patna passed in C.R. No. 1385 of 1985.

2. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for declaration that pattas dated 15-12-1948, 1-7-1950, 24-4-1951 and 26-11-1952 executed by Nagendra Prasad Bhagat in the name of defendant No. 1 were illegal, ineffective and not binding on the plaintiff. There was also a prayer for recovery of possession with mesne profits. The suit was valued on the basis of the rent payable for the land. The defendant filed a written statement and thereafter raised a preliminary objection that the plaintiff has undervalued the suit and also challenged the jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the suit. The Trial Court has held that the suit is governed by Sec. 7(iv)(c) of the Court-fees .Act, 1870 and the plaintiff has rightly valued the lease hold interest created by the lessee. The plaintiff is entitled to put his own valuation of the reliefs claimed. The valuation. it has been held, was not arbitrary and unreasonable and as such it was held that the plaintiff has rightly valued the suit and proper court-fee has be



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top