SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 769

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, K.N.SINGH, S.RANGANATHAN
Sarwan Kumar Onkar Nath – Appellant
Versus
Subhas Kumar Agarwalla – Respondent


Advocates:
AVADH BIHARI ROHTAGI, M.P.Jha, SHANKAR GOPAL PAGIRE, Y.K.Jain

Judgement

VENKATARAMIAH, J.: - The appellant is a firm carrying on business at Jharia. It took on lease a room bearing No. 1in a building belonging to the respondent on a monthly rent of Rs. 70/- on 7-11-1960 and paid in advance two months rent, i.e., Rs, 140/-. The appellant paid rents regularly but did not pay the rent for the months of September and October, 1972. Taking advantage of the non-payment of the rent in respect of the said two months the respondent filed a petition for eviction against the appellant contending that the appellant had become liable to be evicted from the premises in question under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) which provided that on failure to pay two months rent a tenant was liable to be evicted from the premises taken on lease. The appellant pleaded inter alia in his written statement that at the time of the inception of the tenancy it had paid the respondent a sum of Rs. 140/- as advance rent with an understanding that the amount of advance could be set off against the rent whenever necessary or required and that since under S. 3 of t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top