B.C.RAY, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Gupta Sugar Works – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
Judgement
JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J. :- This is a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. The petitioner is engaged in the manufacture of Khandsari sugar. The petitioner challenges the validity of the U. P. Khandsari Sugar (Levy) Order, 1981 ("Levy Order"). It was issued in exercise of powers under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 by virtue of delegation of power by the Central Government under Section 5 of the said Act. The Levy Order requires Khandsari manufacturing units to surrender levy of 50% of the production by sulphitation units in the first process. The balance 50% of that process with the total production by subsequent processes was left free to be sold in the open market by the manufacturing units. The price fixed for the levy Khandsari sugar was Rs. 320/- per quintal.
2. The petitioner challenges the price fixation on the ground that the State Government has not taken into consideration the guidelines in-built in sub-section (3C) of Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The petitioner alleges that the levy order is unreasonable or excessive restriction on the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19(l)(g) and 14 of the Constitution. I
affirmed and followed : New India Sugar Works v. State of U. P.
harmonised : Panipat Co-operative Sugar Mills v. Union of India
Anakapalle Cooperative Agrl. and Industrial Society Ltd. v. Union of India
relied on : Prag Ice and Oil Mills v. Union of India
Shree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.