SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 693

G.L.OZA, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Balram Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK MAHAJAN, C.V.SUBBA RAO, G.A.SHAH, G.D.GUPTA, HEMANT SHARMA

Judgement

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. : - Special leave granted.

2. In 1980 the appellant was working as an Accountant in the Photo Division of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, New Delhi. By that time the appellant had rendered more than 20 years service. By the letter dated 24th of December, 1980 the appellant sought voluntary retirement from the service after having completed more than 20 years service. The said letter dated 24th of December, 1980 which was addressed to the Director, Photo Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting stated, inter alia, as follows:-

"I beg to seek voluntary retirement on 31-3-1981. I had joined Government service on 4th August, 1958, thus I have completed more than 20 years service. My notice period may please be treated w.e.f. 1-1-1981."

3. The appellant states that three months notice was required by the rules of service to which the appellant belonged. The said voluntary retirement was sought under Rule 48-A of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Pension Rules). The Rule 48-A provides as follows:

"48-A. Retirement on completion of 20 years qualifying service.- (1) At any time after a Gover


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top