SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 375

G.L.OZA, V.KHALID
Shama Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
T. Ramakrishna Bhatt – Respondent


Advocates:
G.VISHVANATHA IYER, MADHU MULCHANDANI, NARAYAN NETTAR, T.S.KRISHNAMURTHY IYER, VIJAY VERMA

Judgement

KHALID, J. :- The appellants are the defendants in O.S. 55 of 1952 in the Sub-Court, Mangalore. Their father had obtained sale of the property involved in this appeal by a document dated 28-4-1939, executed by the widowed mother of the respondent-plaintiff who was a minor, aged six years, she acting as his guardian. After he attained majority, he filed a suit for a declaration that the said sale deed was invalid and was not binding upon him and for recovery of possession thereof. The trial Court dismissed the suit. In appeal, the appellate Court confirmed the decree and judgment of the trial Court. In second appeal, the High Court of Kerala, by its judgment, dated 27-11-1969, set aside the judgments of the Courts below, allowed the appeal and decreed the suit. The decree directed recovery of possession of the properties on payment of the sum of Rs. 4,700/- being the sale consideration and a sum of Rs. 4,164/- being the compensation for improvements.

2. On 15-9-1970, the decree-holder, respondent herein, filed R.E.P. 68/70 in the Sub-Court, Kasargod, depositing the amount due under the decree of the High Court and praying for delivery of the properties from the possession of

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top