SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 237

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI AND K.N. SINGH, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 2570 of 1986 (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 8085 of 1986),
D/- 31-7-1986.
Naubat Ram Sharma, Appellant
Versus
Additional District Judge II, Moradabad and others, Respondents.

Headnote:

Makes Concession - Matter Heard On Merits By High Court - Both parties. Mr. S. N. Kacker appearing on behalf of respondents makes concession that matter may be heard on merits by High Court and his client will not take any point before High Court or this Court that appellants are not entitled to be heard on merits in view of Full Bench judgment of High Court – Held, In that view, court set aside judgment and order of High Court and remand matter back to the High Court to be heard on merits – Court is not expressing any opinion on correctness or otherwise of High Courts judgment - Since the matter is pending for a long time, it is desirable that it should be heard and disposed of as expeditiously as possible, and if possible within six months from date - Until High Court hears matter or passes any order, status quo will be maintained – Appeal Disposed of.

ORDER :- Special leave granted

2. Heard both the parties. Mr. S. N. Kacker appearing on behalf of the respondents makes concession that the matter may be heard on merits by the High Court and his client will not take any point before the High Court or this Court that appellants are not entitled to be heard on merits in view of the Full Bench judgment of the High Court of Allahabad. In that view, we set aside the judgment and order of the High Court dated 16th July" 1986 and remand the matter back to the High Court to be heard on merits. We are not expressing any opinion on the correctness or otherwise of the High Courts judgment. Since the matter is pending for a long time, it is desirable that it should be heard and disposed of as expeditiously as possible, and if possible within six months from date. Until the High Court hears the matter or passes any order, status quo will be maintained. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Order accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top