M.P. THAKKAR AND S. NATARAJAN, JJ.
Criminal Appeals Nos. 334-35 of 1986 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Cri) Nos. 1890-91 of 1985),
D/- 21-7-1986.
Ram Naresh Yadav and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Bihar, Respondent.
Order Of Sentence - Challenging Order Of Conviction - Appellants nor counsel for appellants in support of appeal challenging order of conviction and sentence – Held, It is no doubt true that if counsel do not appear when criminal appeals are called out it would hamper working of court and create a serious problem for court - And if this happens often working of court would become well nigh impossible – Court is fully conscious of this dimension of matter but in criminal matters convicts must be heard before their matters are decided on merits - Court can dismiss appeal for non-prosecution and enforce discipline or refer matter to Bar Council with this end in view - But matter can be disposed of on merits only after hearing appellant or his counsel - Court might as well appoint a counsel at State cost to argue on behalf of appellants - Since order of conviction and sentence in present matter has been confirmed without hearing either appellants or counsel for appellants, order must be set aside and matter must be sent back to High Court for passing an appropriate order in accordance with law after hearing appellants or their counsel and on their failure to engage counsel, after hearing counsel appointed by Court to argue on their behalf - As matter is being remanded to High Court, no orders can be passed on bail application - Appellants, if so advised, may approach High Court for bail - Appeals Partly Allowed.
ORDER:- Special leave granted. Heard both the sides.
2. It is an admitted position that neither the appellants nor counsel for the appellants in support of the appeal challenging the order of conviction and sentence, were heard. It is no doubt true that if counsel do not appear when criminal appeals are called out it would hamper the working of the court and create a serious problem for the court. And if this happens often the working of the court would become well nigh impossible. We are fully conscious of this dimension of the matter but in criminal matters the convicts must be heard before their matters are decided on merits. The court can dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution and enforce discipline or refer the matter to the Bar Council with this end in view. But the matter can be disposed of on merits only after hearing the appellant or his counsel. The court might as well appoint a counsel at State cost to argue on behalf of the appellants. Since the order of conviction and sentence in the present matter has been confirmed without hearing either the appellants or counsel for the appellants, the order must be set aside and the matter must be sent back to the High Court for passing an appropriate order in accordance with law after hearing the appellants or their counsel and on their failure to engage counsel, after hearing counsel appointed by the Court to argue on their behalf. As the matter is being remanded to the High Court, no orders can be passed on the bail application. The appellants, if so advised, may approach the High Court for bail.
3. The appeals are party allowed and disposed of accordingly.
Appeals partly allowed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.