JUDGMENT :- Whether or not the High Court was justified in passing a decree for specific performance in favour of the respondents-plaintiffs is the point at issue.

2. Having been taken through the records and the judgment under appeal, and having considered the submissions urged by counsel, we are of the view that whilst the High Court was right in upholding the finding that the plaintiffs were ready and willing to perform the contract whereas the defendant was guilty of the breach thereof, the High Court might well have invoked Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 in order to do complete justice between the parties. Inasmuch as godowns and other costly structures have already been built on the land in question by the appellants (defendants) it would result in special hardship to grant specific performance. This is accordingly a fit case where the problems can be resolved by directing that instead of executing a sale deed of the land in favour of the plaintiffs, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs Rs. 1,25,000/- being the approximate present value of 10 kunthas of land. We, therefore, substitute an order in the following terms in place of the decree passed by the High C