SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 502

V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI AND G.L. OZA, JJ.
Writ Petn. No. 1753, S.L.P.(O) Nos. 13848-49, 14173-14174 and 14923-14924 of 1986,
D/6-5-1987.
M/s. Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Limited and another, Petitioners
Versus
State of Orissa and others, Respondents.
WITH
State of Orissa, Petitioners
Versus
M/s. Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd. and another, Respondents.
WITH
Orissa State Electricity Board and another, Petitioners
Versus
M/s. Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd. and another, Respondents.
AND
M/s. Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd. and another Petitioners
Versus
State of Orissa and others, Respondents.

Advocates:
D.N.Mishra, D.P.MOHANTY, GAURI SHANKAR, K.K.VENUGOPAL, KAPIL SIBAL, LIRA GOSVAMI, R.K.MEHTA

Headnote:

Indian Companies Act, 2013 - Indian Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 22B - Electricity Act, 1948 – Section 49 - Indian Electricity Act, 1959 - Industries - Supply of Energy - Consumers of Energy - Benefit of Clubbing - Supply of energy was made to company regularly as per agreements in respect of first three units - In year State of Orissa resorted to power cuts on account of non-availability of sufficient power in State to meet in full requirements of various categories of consumers - It accordingly passed orders allocating restricted quotas of power to four units of company for water year - This order however. permitted clubbing of electricity supplied to 11 KV IMFAL, 33 KV IMFAL and IMCL furnaces of company - Whether clubbing should be allowed or not with reference to relevant considerations - Whether benefit of clubbing should be allowed to consumers of energy - Whether denial of said benefit to some of power intensive industries on sole ground that they are export oriented industries which had not complied with conditions specified in note to Government order for three years in question was legally valid and permissible – Held, Companys 132 KV IMFAL unit being a 100 export oriented unit it had to be treated separately for purpose of power allocation and hence benefit of clubbing could not be allowed, was illegal and untenable, State Government has merely reiterated very same reason in its impugned letter - This clearly indicated lack of due care and proper application of mind of Government to relevant aspects of matter before order was passed – Court have already indicated that court is in full agreement with view expressed by High Court that it is not legally permissible to refuse facility of clubbing merely on ground that a particular power intensive unit is an export oriented unit so long as it had not been given any special allotment of power on said ground on basis of its fulfilment of conditions specified for a 100 export oriented unit in note appended to Governments order passed under S. 22B of Act - Observations and conclusions recorded in judgment are based on special facts and circumstances of instant case before court where admittedly all power intensive industries in State of Orissa other than export oriented industries had been allowed benefit of clubbing by Board and limited question arising for consideration has been whether denial of said benefit to some of power intensive industries on sole ground that they are export oriented industries which had not complied with conditions specified in note to Government – Court direct respondent company facility of clubbing of energy supply to 11 KV IMFAL unit, 33 KV IMFAL unit, 11 KV IMCL and 132 KV IMFAL unit – Court see no reason to grant prayer of company for quashing order passed by State Government under S. 22B of Act in so far it fixes energy allocation for different units but said order shall not be treated or construed as denying facility of clubbing to company – Petition Allowed.

Judgement

BALAKRISHNA ERADI, J. :- M/s. Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd. - the petitioner in Writ Petiton No. 1753 of 1986 and in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 14923-14924 of 1986 is a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act which is engaged, inter alia, in the manufacture of ferro silicon and silicon metal which are said to be a valuable raw-material used by the Defence establishments in India and also exported out of the country the second petitioner in the aforesaid writ petition and the special leave petitions is the Managing Director of the company. The company has installed three units namely, 11 KV, 33 KV and 132 KV furnaces in which it is manufacturing ferro alloys and silicon metal in a composite industrial complex in a place called Therubali in the State of Orissa. The company has also a subsidiary by name M/s. Indian Metal and Carbide Ltd. engaged in the manufacture of silicon carbide and its factory is also situated in the same industrial complex. All the four units utilise electricity as raw material and they are, therefore, classified as power intensive industrial units- the four units shall hereinafter referred to as "l l KV IMFAL, "33 KV IMFAL" 11 KV IMCL" and "132 KV IMFAL". - The company has entered into separate agreements with the Orissa State Electricity Board (hereinafter called the Board) for supply of electric energy to these four different units and the rates of tariff to be charged for such supply. The agreement in respect of 11 KV IMFAL was entered into initially on 3-4-1967 and subsequently renewed on 1-8-1983, that in respect of 33 KV IMFAL on January 2,1974 and the agreement for supply of 11 KV IMCL was entered into on January 28, 1975. The agreement in respect of supply of energy to 132 KV IMFAL was entered into on 4-12-1982. These agreements show that the Board had agreed to supply 78.8 MU for 11 KV IMFAL unit for the manufacture of silicon metal/charge chrome by the company, 1971 MU for the 33 KV IMFAL unit for the manufacture of ferro silicon/silicon metal, 15.8 MU for the 11 KV IMCL for the manufacture of silicon carbide and 262.8 MU for the 132 KV IMFAL unit for the manufacture of charge chrome/ferro silicon/silicon metal. As already indicated, all the above furnaces of the company are located in the same complex and are adjacent to one another. The tariff fixed for supply of the energy to the first three units is the same and that for the 132 KV IMFAL is 0.5 paise less per unit.

2. Supply of energy was made to the company regularly as per the agreements in respect of the first three units till the year 1979-80. The unit of time for supply of electricity adopted by the Board is the water year which commences on the lst of July of a year and ends with 30th June of the succeeding year. In the year 1979-80, the State of Orissa resorted to power cuts on account of non-availability of sufficient power in the State to meet in full the requirements of the various categories of consumers. It accordingly. passed orders allocating restricted quotas of power to the four units of the company for the water year 1979-80. This order however. permitted the clubbing of the electricity supplied to the 11 KV IMFAL, 33 KV IMFAL and IMCL furnaces of the company. The 132 KV IMFAL furnace of the company had not been commissioned at that time. The aforesaid position continued for the water years 1981-82 and 1982-83.

3. The companys 132 KV IMFAL furnace was commissioned on 20th February, 1983 but the agreement of supply of energy to this unit had been executed on December 4,1982 itself. On July 16,1983, the company addressed a letter to the Board requesting the facility of clubbing of the power allocated to its four furnaces for the water year 1983-84. By a teleprinter message dated August 4, 1983 sent by the Chief Engineer of the Board to the Superintending Engineer, Talcher, it was intimated that IMFAL and IMCL may be permitted to draw the power allotted to the four units taken together as requested b



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top