SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 117

A.P.SEN, S.NATARAJAN
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Wing Commander R. R. Hingorani (Retd. ) – Respondent


Advocates:
C.V.SUBBA RAO, D.N.GOVARDHAN, G.D.GUPTA, RAM PANJWANI, V.K.KANTH, VIJAY PANJAVANI

Judgment

SEN, JJ.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by special leave directed against the judgment and order of the Delhi High Court dated 11/09/1985 raises a question of frequent occurrence. The question is whether where a Government servant retains accommodation allotted to him under SR 317-B-11 beyond the concessional period of two months permissible under sub-r. (2) thereof, the liability to pay damages equivalent to the market rent for the period of such unauthorised occupation under SR 317-B-22 is contingent upon the Directorate of Estates serving a notice upon him that he would be liable to pay market rent for retention of such accommodation as held by the High Court.

( 2 ) PUT very briefly, the essential facts are these. In the year 1968 the respondent who was then a Squadron Leader in the Indian Air Force on being posted at the Headquaqers, Western Command, Palam, Cantonment, Delhi, applied on 9/05/1968 for allotment of accommodation in the Curzon Road Hostel, New Delhi. In the application for allotment he gave a declaration that he had read the Allotment of Government Residences (General Pool in Delhi) Rules, 1963 and the allotment made to him shall be subject to the said Rules, including



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top