SABYASACHI MUKHARJI AND V. RAMASWAMI, JJ.
Civil Appeal No.4800 of 1989 (arising out of S.L.P.No.7705 of 1987), D/- 30-11-1989.
Dandasi Sahu, Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa, Respondent.
Arbitration Act - Section 8 - Inability to arbitrate - Supplemental claim - Work entrusted to appellant was to commence on to be completed within months on or before and total cost of work - Superintending Engineer Central Range was nominated as sole arbitrator to decide dispute and give award- This arbitrator having accepted appointment entered on reference and issued notices to both parties directing them to file their claims- appellant filed a claim statement on before arbitrator - In this claim statement he had made a detailed description of each of items of claim and total of items claimed came to - To this he added interest at per cent from date which according to him each of claims should have been settled making a total claim of interest to tune - He thus prayed for an award of and also prayed for further interest on amount from till of award and thereafter until payment at per cent – Held, learned counsel for appellant however contended that invalid part relating to grant of interest may be set aside and award may be accepted so far as claim for value of work done applying formula adopted in State - learned Judges who decided case after holding that inclusion of interest rendered award invalid proceeded to separate invalid part from rent stating that total amount awarded is principal plus interest rate of interest and period for which interest was claimed before (being?) known principle could be determined easily and on that basis principal amount and interest out of total amount awarded was divided and award was sustained relating to principal - Court are unable to apply this principle in this case as State had disputed major part of claim in their counter statements before arbitrator and Court have held that award suffers not merely on ground that it included interest but also on ground of non-application of mind - Appeal dismissed.
Judgement
V. RAMASWAMI, J. :- Special leave granted.
2. In respect of a dispute relating to the work Lankagada Minor Irrigation Project (Balance Work) in Jagannathaprasad Block which was entrusted to him, the appellant contractor, invoking clause 23 of the agreement and Section 8 of the Arbitration Act requested the Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Organisation, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, to nominate an arbitrator. It may be mentioned that before making this request for nomination of an arbitrator the appellant made a claim on 16-6-1975 before the Executive Engineer, M. I. Division, Berhampur, Ganjam, claiming to be paid a sum of Rs. 2,81,745 / -. He had also claimed interest on this at the rate of 18 per cent from the date of receiving of the claim book till payment. The work entrusted to the appellant was to commence on 6-12-1971 and to be completed within 18 months i.e. on or before 5-6-1973 and the total cost of the work was Rs. 9,98,970/ -. One Shri D. C. Panda, Superintending Engineer, Central Range, was nominated as the sole arbitrator to decide the dispute and give the award. This arbitrator having accepted the appointment entered on the reference and issued notices to both the parties directing them to file their claims. The appellant filed a claim statement on 5-4-1977 before the arbitrator. In this claim statement he had made a detailed description of each of the items of the claim and the total of the 15 items claimed came to Rs. 3,87,796 / -. To this he added interest at 18 per cent from the date which according to him each of the claims should have been settled making a total claim of interest to the tune of Rs. 2,95,894/-. He thus prayed for an award of Rs. 6,83,690/- and also prayed for further interest , on Rs. 3,87,796/- from 6-4-1977 till date of award and thereafter until payment at 18 per cent. It may be mentioned that in this statement of claim made before the arbitrator some of the claims made before the Executive Engineer were omitted, some were reduced whereas some new claims were introduced and some other items of claim were enhanced. The State of Orissa filed a written statement and the arbitration proceedings continued for some time but before the arbitrator could make the award an application before the Subordinate Judge, Bhubaneshwar was filed under Sections 8(2) and 12 of the Arbitration Act. By an order dated 17-12-1979 the learned Subordinate Judge removed the arbitrator and appointed one Shri J. Pati, Chief Construction Engineer, Paradip Port as the sole arbitrator to decide the dispute between the parties. However, since Shri J. Pati expressed his inability to arbitrate, by another order dated 16-4-1980 the, court appointed Shri Banabasi Patnaik, Superintending Engineer, Sambalpur as the sole arbitrator in place of Shri J. Pati. This arbitrator entered on the reference, got all the relevant records from the Previous arbitrator continued the hearing on the 9th June and 9th July, 1980. On the ground that the appellant has not included some of his claims "relating to this work" in the claim statement submitted to the previous arbitrator, he made a supplemental claim for a sum of Rs. 8,27,857/- and prayed that in addition to the claim stated in the original claim statement a sum of Rs. 8,27,857/- be awarded in his favour with interest at 18 per cent per annum on Rs. 8,27,857/- from 14-10-1973 till date of payment. The State of Orissa not only disputed the claim made but also objected to the entertainment of an additional claim in their written statement dated August 13, 1981. The arbitrator, however, decided to entertain the supplemental- claim and proceeded with the hearing of the dispute. The supplement claim consisted of 11 items. As seen from the note papers, the arguments on supplemental claims 1 to 6 were heard on two different dates and the hearing was adjourned to 8-11-1981. On that. day arguments in respect of rest of the supplemental claim items were heard and the hearing was closed. On the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.