SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 511

K.RAMASWAMY, N.M.KASLIWAL
Indu Kant: Dhirendra Kumar Saxena: Renu Raheja: Neelima Mittal: Daya Nand Prasad: Rajeev Kishore Saxena: R. K. Saxena: State Of U. P. : State Of U. P. : Principal, S. N. Medical College, Agra – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. : State Of U. P. : Secretary, Medical Health, Lucknow: Secretary, Medical Health, Lucknow: State Of U. P. : State Of U. P. : State Of U. P. : Vijay Tilak: Yogendra Singh: Kavita Shankar Garh – Respondent


Advocates:
AJAY K.AGRAWAL, E.C.AGARWAL, KAMINI JAISWAL, N.M.GHATATE, NINA RAIZADA, PRADIP MISHRA, PRASHANT KUMAR SINGH, R.B.MISHRA, R.D.UPADHYAY, R.P.GUPTA, RACHNA GUPTA, S.K.MEHTA, S.M.Jain, SUSHIL JAIN, VIKRANT SINGH, VIMAL ROY, VISHVAJIT SINGH, YOGESHAR PRASAD

Judgement

KASLIWAL, J.:- All the above cases relate to the Doctors who had appeared in the entrance examination of 1990-91 for admission to Post-Graduate Medical Courses of seven medical colleges in the State of Uttar Pradesh. In some of these cases the candidates have filed Writ Petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution directly in this Court while in some cases the candidates first approached the High Court and being unsuccessful in the High Court have filed Special Leave Petitions against the orders of the High Court and there are some Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh or by the Principal of the Medical Colleges against the orders of the High Court where the High Court had passed the orders in favour of the candidates. Though the points raised in all these cases are identical but in some cases, the notice has not been served on the respondent candidates and in some Special Leave Petitions the defects pointed out by the office have not been removed by the petitioners. In view of the circumstances mentioned above we are stating the facts of the Writ Petitions filed by the Doctors under Article 32 of the Constitution and decision in these cases would c

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top