SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 549

A.M.AHMADI, M.M.PUNCHHI
Food Corporation Of India – Appellant
Versus
E. Kuttappan – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, M.K.D.NAMBUDIRY, M.P.VINOD, S.K.Gambhir, Surinder Karnail, VIVEK GAMBHIR

Judgement

PUNCHHI, J.:- Leave granted.

2. These two appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated January 4, 1990 passed by a learned single Judge of the Kerala High Court at Ernakulam in Civil Revision Petitions Nos. 1520 and 1527 of 1989 (reported in AIR 1990 NOC 132: (1990) 1 Ker LT 245).

3. The facts giving rise thereto are few and meaningful. The respondent filed two suits against the appellants praying under S. 20 of the Arbitration Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for an appointment of an arbitrator to resolve the disputes said to have arisen out of contracts inter se. One B. S. Hegde was appointed as an arbitrator. He made awards on October 3, 1988. On that date itself, the arbitrator on his own had given notice to the parties under S. 14 (l) of the making and signing of the awards. The respondent, on October 4, 1988, requested the arbitrator by means of a letter to forward the awards to his counsel for filing the same in the Court. On October 12, 1988, the arbitrator forwarded the awards and the entire record to the advocate of the respondent by a forwarding letter with copy of the letter to the appellant. On October 25, 1988, respondents counsel fi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top